Vendor risk, tiered by consequence
Most organisations hold hundreds of vendors and assess them all the same way. The ones that could stop operations get the same scrutiny as the rest. Dimeri tiers by consequence and puts the effort where the exposure is.
Tiered by consequence
Why vendor risk gets missed
Every vendor treated alike
A uniform questionnaire goes to every supplier, which produces volume without a clear view of where the real exposure sits.
Assessed once, then never again
Onboarding due diligence is thorough and then nothing happens for four years, while the vendor's own risk profile moves.
No one owns the relationship
Procurement signed it, operations depend on it, and no one is accountable for whether the controls promised in the contract operate.
Concentration stays invisible
Four critical services run through one provider, which is obvious only in hindsight because nothing aggregates the dependency.
Run third party risk the steady way with Dimeri
Tiered by what they could cost you
Vendors are classified by the consequence of their failure, so critical suppliers get depth and low tier ones get a proportionate check.
Contract terms mapped to controls
The security, continuity and compliance obligations a contract imposes become tracked controls with evidence, not static contract terms.
A named owner per relationship
Each vendor has one accountable person in the business, with reassessment cycles and expiry dates that reach them before the date.
Concentration surfaced
Dependency across services, sites and entities is aggregated, so a single point of failure is visible before it proves itself.
A clear path to proportionate diligence
Four steps from a uniform checklist to assurance that matches the exposure.
Book a demoEvery third party is recorded with the service it provides and the consequence of its failure. Tiering by consequence rather than by spend is usually the step that changes the picture most.
Built for clarity, designed for control
The vendor register, the contract controls and the concentration view are one record seen from different angles.
Third party register
Every vendor with its tier, owner, service and current assessment score in one filterable view.
Concentration and exposure
Where dependency clusters across services and entities, so single points of failure surface early.
Contractual controls
The security, continuity and compliance obligations a contract imposes, tracked with test evidence.
Remediation tracking
Findings from assessments become actions with owners and dates, carried until closed with proof.
Committee reporting
Portfolio position, tier movement and overdue reassessments generated from live data.
When third party risk becomes a business advantage
Ready before you are asked
A due diligence questionnaire, a regulator query or a client's supply chain audit draws on assessments that already exist with their dates.
Fewer surprises from suppliers
Reassessment on a cycle catches a vendor's decline while there is still time to plan, rather than on the day the service stops.
Diligence effort in proportion
Tiering by consequence means critical vendors get real scrutiny and lower tiers get a proportionate check.
Ready to Transform Your GRC?
Join governance, risk, and compliance teams using AI to work smarter.