Public Audit Act coverage that closes findings before they escalate
Every notification, recommendation and remedial directive tracked with its deadline, its owner and the evidence of response, so nothing lapses into personal exposure by oversight.
Compliance at a glance
What the Public Audit Act changed
Material irregularity register
Every notification logged with its date and response deadline, the draft response assembled from existing evidence and the submitted response retained with its acknowledgement.
Recommendations tracked to closure
Each recommendation held as an action with an owner, an implementation deadline and escalation, with evidence of what was done reported to the audit committee each cycle.
Personal exposure visible in one view
Open loss exposure, elapsed time against unimplemented directives and certificate of debt risk summarised for the accounting officer so days remaining replace guesswork.
Prior year findings that close
All audit findings carried forward with owners and escalation, because most material irregularities begin as ordinary findings that were never resolved.
Public Audit Act compliance, covered by default
The 2018 amendment gave the Auditor-General enforcement powers that reach individuals. Dimeri tracks every notification, deadline, recommendation and remedial directive so the accounting officer sees days remaining rather than a folder of correspondence.
Material irregularity register
Every notification logged with its date, the response deadline, the draft response and the evidence it draws on, so the clock is visible from the moment it starts.
Recommendation tracking
Each Auditor-General recommendation held as an action with an owner, an implementation deadline, escalation and evidence of what was done, reported to the audit committee each cycle.
Remedial action management
Binding remedial directives recorded with their terms, deadline and recovery progress, tracked step by step so nothing lapses by oversight.
Personal exposure dashboard
Open loss exposure, elapsed time against unimplemented directives and certificate of debt risk summarised for the accounting officer in one view.
Prior year finding follow-up
All audit findings carried forward with owners, due dates and escalation, because most material irregularities begin as ordinary findings that were never closed.
The obligations Dimeri tracks
The Public Audit Act is less a checklist than a process with deadlines attached. Dimeri holds the process, the dates and the evidence of what was done.
Material irregularity identification
Understanding what qualifies, and identifying likely material irregularities before the Auditor-General does.
- Register of potential material irregularities
- Loss or harm assessment recorded against each
- Link to the control failure that caused it
- Early escalation to the accounting officer
Notification and response
Where the Auditor-General notifies the accounting officer or authority of a material irregularity, a written response is required within the period allowed.
- Notification logged with the date received
- Response deadline tracked with reminders
- Draft response assembled from existing evidence
- Submitted response retained with its acknowledgement
Recommendations in the audit report
Recommendations made by the Auditor-General in respect of a material irregularity, with a period within which they must be implemented.
- Each recommendation held as an action with an owner
- Implementation deadline tracked and escalated
- Evidence of implementation attached
- Status reported to the audit committee each cycle
Remedial action
Binding remedial action taken by the Auditor-General where recommendations are not implemented, including action directed at recovering a loss.
- Remedial directive recorded with its terms and deadline
- Steps taken documented as they happen
- Recovery progress tracked against the amount
- Reporting back to the Auditor-General evidenced
Certificate of debt exposure
Where remedial action to recover a loss is not implemented, the accounting officer may be issued with a certificate of debt in their personal capacity.
- Open loss exposure visible to the accounting officer
- Elapsed time against each unimplemented directive
- Personal exposure summarised for the accounting officer
- Board and executive authority kept informed
Prior year findings and repeat exposure
Ordinary audit findings that are not resolved are the usual route to a material irregularity in a later year.
- All audit findings carried forward until closed
- Repeat finding flag with the number of cycles
- Root cause analysis across findings
- Audit action plan owned at directorate level
Getting Public Audit Act coverage in place
4 steps from where you are today to a Public Audit Act position your auditor can rely on.
Book a demoCurrent material irregularity notifications, recommendations, remedial directives and unresolved prior year findings are loaded with their dates and their owners.
How Dimeri covers Public Audit Act
The clock is visible
Every notification, recommendation and remedial directive carries its deadline, its owner and its escalation path. The accounting officer sees days remaining rather than a folder of correspondence.
Evidence already gathered
Because controls are evidenced through the year, the response to a notification draws on records that already exist with their dates and authors instead of a reconstruction assembled under pressure.
Cause, not just consequence
Each material irregularity is linked to the control that failed and the risk it sat under. That is what makes the remediation credible and stops the same irregularity recurring in the next cycle.
Public Audit Act questions
What counts as a material irregularity?
The Act defines it as any non-compliance with or contravention of legislation, fraud, theft or a breach of a fiduciary duty identified during an audit performed under the Act that resulted in or is likely to result in a material financial loss, the misuse or loss of a material public resource, or substantial harm to a public sector institution or the general public. Whether a specific matter qualifies is a judgement for the Auditor-General, and your legal advisers should be involved early.
Can the Auditor-General really hold an accounting officer personally liable?
The 2018 amendment provides for a certificate of debt to be issued against an accounting officer or accounting authority in their personal capacity where remedial action to recover a loss is not implemented. It sits at the end of a sequence that starts with notification and moves through recommendations and remedial action, so there are several points at which it can be avoided by responding properly.
How does Dimeri help during a material irregularity process?
It holds the notification, the deadline, the draft and final response, the recommendations, the remedial directives and the evidence of what was done, all against the same matter. The accounting officer sees the open position and time remaining rather than an email thread, and the audit committee gets the same view.
Does this replace our relationship with the audit team?
No. It changes what you bring to it. Rather than assembling support after a request, the evidence for each control and each remediation step already exists with its date, which shortens the exchange considerably.
Is this a substitute for legal advice?
No. The material irregularity process carries personal consequences and should be handled with your legal advisers. This page describes how Dimeri structures the tracking and evidence around that process.
Ready to Transform Your GRC?
Join governance, risk, and compliance teams using AI to work smarter.